Seulontatulos, ei sijoitussuositus. Ihminen tekee päätöksen.
Julkaistu 2026-08-01 15:22:04 UTC · malli dividend-1.0.0 · laskenta calc-1.7.0 · snapshot SHA-256 dea244e85b41c24c81eab9ab7dfe232ae352eb8fc93062778ea7241ed4569cfe
#1
River Tech p.l.c.
RIVER · XOSL · NOK
Poäng 42,5
Myönteiset tekijät
- Profitability and business quality are strong relative to the model thresholds.
- Värdering is reasonable relative to earnings and cash flow under the model.
Vastatekijät
- The model identified no single severe weakness, but market, company and data risks remain.
Riski
The screening result is not investment advice. The share price may fall materially, fundamentals may change, source data may contain errors and the model weights may fit this company poorly.
Avaa todistusaineisto →
#2
Titanium Oyj
TITAN · XHEL · EUR
Poäng 40,5
Myönteiset tekijät
- Profitability and business quality are strong relative to the model thresholds.
- Värdering is reasonable relative to earnings and cash flow under the model.
Vastatekijät
- The model identified no single severe weakness, but market, company and data risks remain.
Riski
The screening result is not investment advice. The share price may fall materially, fundamentals may change, source data may contain errors and the model weights may fit this company poorly.
Avaa todistusaineisto →
#3
2020 Bulkers Ltd.
2020 · XOSL · NOK
Poäng 39,5
Myönteiset tekijät
- Profitability and business quality are strong relative to the model thresholds.
- Värdering is reasonable relative to earnings and cash flow under the model.
Vastatekijät
- The model identified no single severe weakness, but market, company and data risks remain.
Riski
The screening result is not investment advice. The share price may fall materially, fundamentals may change, source data may contain errors and the model weights may fit this company poorly.
Avaa todistusaineisto →
#4
eQ Oyj
EQV1V · XHEL · EUR
Poäng 37,3
Myönteiset tekijät
- Profitability and business quality are strong relative to the model thresholds.
- Värdering is reasonable relative to earnings and cash flow under the model.
Vastatekijät
- The model identified no single severe weakness, but market, company and data risks remain.
Riski
The screening result is not investment advice. The share price may fall materially, fundamentals may change, source data may contain errors and the model weights may fit this company poorly.
Avaa todistusaineisto →
#5
Fondia Oyj
FONDIA · XHEL · EUR
Poäng 36,2
Myönteiset tekijät
- Profitability and business quality are strong relative to the model thresholds.
- Värdering is reasonable relative to earnings and cash flow under the model.
Vastatekijät
- The model identified no single severe weakness, but market, company and data risks remain.
Riski
The screening result is not investment advice. The share price may fall materially, fundamentals may change, source data may contain errors and the model weights may fit this company poorly.
Avaa todistusaineisto →
#6
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
ERIBR · XHEL · EUR
Poäng 36,1
Myönteiset tekijät
- Profitability and business quality are strong relative to the model thresholds.
- Värdering is reasonable relative to earnings and cash flow under the model.
Vastatekijät
- The model identified no single severe weakness, but market, company and data risks remain.
Riski
The screening result is not investment advice. The share price may fall materially, fundamentals may change, source data may contain errors and the model weights may fit this company poorly.
Avaa todistusaineisto →
#7
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson ser. B
ERIC-B · XSTO · SEK
Poäng 35,3
Myönteiset tekijät
- Profitability and business quality are strong relative to the model thresholds.
- Värdering is reasonable relative to earnings and cash flow under the model.
Vastatekijät
- The model identified no single severe weakness, but market, company and data risks remain.
Riski
The screening result is not investment advice. The share price may fall materially, fundamentals may change, source data may contain errors and the model weights may fit this company poorly.
Avaa todistusaineisto →
#8
ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA
ABG · XOSL · NOK
Poäng 35,0
Myönteiset tekijät
- Profitability and business quality are strong relative to the model thresholds.
- Värdering is reasonable relative to earnings and cash flow under the model.
Vastatekijät
- The model identified no single severe weakness, but market, company and data risks remain.
Riski
The screening result is not investment advice. The share price may fall materially, fundamentals may change, source data may contain errors and the model weights may fit this company poorly.
Avaa todistusaineisto →
#9
Sentia ASA
SNTIA · XOSL · NOK
Poäng 34,8
Myönteiset tekijät
- Profitability and business quality are strong relative to the model thresholds.
- Värdering is reasonable relative to earnings and cash flow under the model.
Vastatekijät
- The model identified no single severe weakness, but market, company and data risks remain.
Riski
The screening result is not investment advice. The share price may fall materially, fundamentals may change, source data may contain errors and the model weights may fit this company poorly.
Avaa todistusaineisto →
#10
Vistin Pharma ASA
VISTN · XOSL · NOK
Poäng 34,8
Myönteiset tekijät
- Profitability and business quality are strong relative to the model thresholds.
- Värdering is reasonable relative to earnings and cash flow under the model.
Vastatekijät
- The model identified no single severe weakness, but market, company and data risks remain.
Riski
The screening result is not investment advice. The share price may fall materially, fundamentals may change, source data may contain errors and the model weights may fit this company poorly.
Avaa todistusaineisto →