Julkinen Top 10

Seulontatulos, ei sijoitussuositus. Ihminen tekee päätöksen.

Julkaistu 2026-08-01 15:22:03 UTC · malli general-1.0.0 · laskenta calc-1.7.0 · snapshot SHA-256 ab24486e0239ea5350464e987828b796701c0a870d2a779528a4915ad031f95a

#1

River Tech p.l.c.

RIVER · XOSL · NOK

Score 60,0

Myönteiset tekijät

  • Profitability and business quality are strong relative to the model thresholds.
  • Valuation is reasonable relative to earnings and cash flow under the model.

Vastatekijät

  • The model identified no single severe weakness, but market, company and data risks remain.

Riski

The screening result is not investment advice. The share price may fall materially, fundamentals may change, source data may contain errors and the model weights may fit this company poorly.

Avaa todistusaineisto →

#2

2020 Bulkers Ltd.

2020 · XOSL · NOK

Score 56,9

Myönteiset tekijät

  • Profitability and business quality are strong relative to the model thresholds.
  • Valuation is reasonable relative to earnings and cash flow under the model.

Vastatekijät

  • The model identified no single severe weakness, but market, company and data risks remain.

Riski

The screening result is not investment advice. The share price may fall materially, fundamentals may change, source data may contain errors and the model weights may fit this company poorly.

Avaa todistusaineisto →

#3

Titanium Oyj

TITAN · XHEL · EUR

Score 56,7

Myönteiset tekijät

  • Profitability and business quality are strong relative to the model thresholds.
  • Valuation is reasonable relative to earnings and cash flow under the model.

Vastatekijät

  • The model identified no single severe weakness, but market, company and data risks remain.

Riski

The screening result is not investment advice. The share price may fall materially, fundamentals may change, source data may contain errors and the model weights may fit this company poorly.

Avaa todistusaineisto →

#4

eQ Oyj

EQV1V · XHEL · EUR

Score 51,3

Myönteiset tekijät

  • Profitability and business quality are strong relative to the model thresholds.
  • Valuation is reasonable relative to earnings and cash flow under the model.

Vastatekijät

  • The model identified no single severe weakness, but market, company and data risks remain.

Riski

The screening result is not investment advice. The share price may fall materially, fundamentals may change, source data may contain errors and the model weights may fit this company poorly.

Avaa todistusaineisto →

#5

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)

ERIBR · XHEL · EUR

Score 50,8

Myönteiset tekijät

  • Profitability and business quality are strong relative to the model thresholds.
  • Valuation is reasonable relative to earnings and cash flow under the model.

Vastatekijät

  • The model identified no single severe weakness, but market, company and data risks remain.

Riski

The screening result is not investment advice. The share price may fall materially, fundamentals may change, source data may contain errors and the model weights may fit this company poorly.

Avaa todistusaineisto →

#6

Fondia Oyj

FONDIA · XHEL · EUR

Score 50,5

Myönteiset tekijät

  • Profitability and business quality are strong relative to the model thresholds.
  • Valuation is reasonable relative to earnings and cash flow under the model.

Vastatekijät

  • The model identified no single severe weakness, but market, company and data risks remain.

Riski

The screening result is not investment advice. The share price may fall materially, fundamentals may change, source data may contain errors and the model weights may fit this company poorly.

Avaa todistusaineisto →

#7

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson ser. B

ERIC-B · XSTO · SEK

Score 49,5

Myönteiset tekijät

  • Profitability and business quality are strong relative to the model thresholds.
  • Valuation is reasonable relative to earnings and cash flow under the model.

Vastatekijät

  • The model identified no single severe weakness, but market, company and data risks remain.

Riski

The screening result is not investment advice. The share price may fall materially, fundamentals may change, source data may contain errors and the model weights may fit this company poorly.

Avaa todistusaineisto →

#8

ABG Sundal Collier Holding ASA

ABG · XOSL · NOK

Score 48,9

Myönteiset tekijät

  • Profitability and business quality are strong relative to the model thresholds.
  • Valuation is reasonable relative to earnings and cash flow under the model.

Vastatekijät

  • The model identified no single severe weakness, but market, company and data risks remain.

Riski

The screening result is not investment advice. The share price may fall materially, fundamentals may change, source data may contain errors and the model weights may fit this company poorly.

Avaa todistusaineisto →

#9

Evli Oyj

EVLI · XHEL · EUR

Score 48,6

Myönteiset tekijät

  • Profitability and business quality are strong relative to the model thresholds.
  • Valuation is reasonable relative to earnings and cash flow under the model.

Vastatekijät

  • The model identified no single severe weakness, but market, company and data risks remain.

Riski

The screening result is not investment advice. The share price may fall materially, fundamentals may change, source data may contain errors and the model weights may fit this company poorly.

Avaa todistusaineisto →

#10

Luotea Oyj

LUOTEA · XHEL · EUR

Score 48,6

Myönteiset tekijät

  • Valuation is reasonable relative to earnings and cash flow under the model.

Vastatekijät

  • The model identified no single severe weakness, but market, company and data risks remain.

Riski

The screening result is not investment advice. The share price may fall materially, fundamentals may change, source data may contain errors and the model weights may fit this company poorly.

Avaa todistusaineisto →